Global warming is a major global issue that without the right attention will have harmful effects on the future of our world. The media, and in particular global news has been criticised for shielding society from the harsh truth. In this weeks lecture Tanja Dreher discussed the media and its actions towards climate change; and issues that sparks much debate throughout society. It requires us to think globally and act globally, because the outcome of our actions will be inflicted on the future civilizations. Dreher also argued that our perspective of climate change is mediated, and we are often not receiving the whole story (Dreher, 2014).
This is where the issue of ‘false balance’ comes into play. ‘False balance’ is where the media and journalists present an issue as being more balanced between differing beliefs than the actual evidence supports. Journalists may present this evidence out of proportion when it comes to the actual evidence available for each viewpoint. They may also censor the information that would establish one sides claims as unsubstantiated and thus, manipulating the coverage of certain issues. “In effect, reporters may for too long have been balancing opinions about science when in fact they might be better have been evaluating and reporting evidence based on the science”, and in doing so would report the issue of climate change in a less bias manner (Ward, 2009 p. 14).
Because climate change will ultimately effect the future of our environment Barak Obama stated “for all the immediate challenges that we gather to address this week – terrorism, instability, inequality, disease – there’s one issue that will define the contours of this century more dramatically than any other, and that is the urgent and growing threat of a changing climate” (Eltham, 2014). Therefore, delving into the detrimental effects of climate change as a result of the worlds relationship with the environment.
The effect of climate change is already a reality in many small islands and states in the pacific. It is here the civilians suffer water contamination, coastal erosion, inundation and risks to food security. ‘Voice for voiceless’, is using the knowledge, beliefs and realities of climate change in these regions because the voices we hear stray away from these impacts. Mary Robinson the United Nations high commissioner for human rights 1997-2022 stated “A climate justice approach will amplify the voices of those who have done least to cause climate change, but who are effected most severely by it” (Dreher, 2014).
Along with these movements many agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol attempt to minimise the damage done to the world through legally binding contracts. Other summits have occurred in attempt to change attitudes towards climate change. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon stated, “the purpose of the 2014 Climate Summit was to raise political momentum for a meaningful universal climate agreement in Paris in 2015.” However, many of the world leaders didn’t attend this meeting, our Prime Minister Tony Abbott being one of them (Eltham, 2014).
Along with this the current Australian government has repealed the carbon tax, without a replacement environmental scheme. Goal and gas is our main source of power, with more mines being built, therefore, causing more detriment to our environment and ignoring the evidence given about the long-term effects of global-warming. Through the media’s falsely balanced and excessively mediated coverage of climate change, and the current governments attention being on military action and un-renewable resources it is evident that society is unable to gain the complete unbiased truth of climate change.
Sources:
Dreher, T 2014, ‘Global Crises and Global News: Pacific Calling Partnership’, lecture notes, BCM111, University of Wollongong, delivered 8 October 2014.
Eltham, B 2014,’ ‘Obama is Right, Climate Change A Greather Threat Than Terror’, New Matilda.com, 25 September, viewed 10 October 2014, <https://newmatilda.com/2014/09/25/obama-right-climate-change-greater-threat-terror/ >.
Ward, B 2009, ‘Journalism ethics and climate change reporting in a period of intense media uncertainty’, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, vol. 9, pp. 13-15